Why must user? Why not Dev?? I mean that is

your service

All allocated dyp holdings from the team and some extra has already been deposited. Lack of balance on eth chain side of the bridge is due to user’s activity. Hence, users should make a deposit and bridge from erc20 to bep20 to fill erc20 side.

Yeah people add your .20 token to the bridge in exchange for the .16 token. lol We really need kucoin to accept the bsc chain! until then the total trading volume will be split between coinbase, kucoin and mexc, huobi, gate. Its basically trading two different tokens right now.

I am just stating a way to fill the bridge as lack of erc20 balance is due to user’s activity as well. The is on the works to make a solution which they are already developing a multi-chain staking contract that will be able to use its resources for the bridges and rebalances through chains.

Why you created another chain if you not full support to them? I think team must remove all chain except erc20.

The team’s holdings allocated for the bridge has already been deposited. The team will launch a multi-chain DEX and a multi-chain staking contract. Also once all major CEX accepts BSC/AVAX deposit, crossing chains should not be a problem anymore. Hoping for more of your patience.

One thing, team must pay some tax to kucoin for open all chain. That is mean full support for project.

Thanks for your suggestion, Will forward it to the team for them to see the possibility. But rest assured they are already in talks with these major exchanges for multi-chain support.