If every solution is born from the fear that token lps will leave, what do you think happens if this vortex scheme actually closes the deficit? Same end result, except you now...
Doesn't adding liquidity also run the risk of exacerbating the current deficits?
Are these good tokenomics in the room with us right now?
https://fxtwitter.com/napgener/status/1593427633374625792?s=20&t=R0eyBtNr8nj5rEkvEJIqhA
Is this truly a concern for you?
bros how will chico recover from this?
I'm not seeing the bull case. We put some tiny buy pressure on bnt via the vortex using protocol fees. And then what? The lending and arbs strategies are not close to fruition
On what planet is providing an email address for the SEC worthy of a warning?
Shouldn't the weekly updates include progress updates about the deficit?
how old were you when you found yourself on the side of majority because your parents revealed santa wasn't real?
right, because europeans don't pay taxes?
mark and yourself both had titles or positions associated with your work. who bestowed those upon you? your boss who isn't a boss?
Hypothetically, bnt does need to outperform the other assets in its pools to decrease the deficit. The question is, why will it?
The supply hard cap will be 100 million, with 35 million available at launch. Yes or no?
hi is there a problem with the lending UI?
Can I ask why John was muted for a week? He didn't engage in personal attacks or outlandish behavior imo
are you going to share your findings on the bird app?
Guys any updates on how public testnet is going?
is this sufficient liquidity to perform meaningful arbs in the room with us right now?
so you love fags?