Is anyone else feeling fine about all this? I literally feel better than a few weeks ago because now nothing is dependent on everyone watching the BTC number go up.
I see. Where can I read more of these details?
So does anyone know why the Sergey dumps stopped?
You know most money is created by commercial (private sector) banks when they make loans, right?
How many more years until speculationcoin (ticker BTC) no longer leads the market?
Like, say I am a DON that wants to process only one type of transaction. Why would I be trying to continually accumulate LINK tokens?
I am trying to understand the "I'm a bank that wants to send and receive data through Chainlink" case. Do I run a DON?
Why does this token follow BTC now? The project has little or nothing to do with Bitcoin.
How can one node look to multiple committees for consensus? Is that like, built into the protocol?
So is everyone just demoralized? What are we looking forward to, what's the next milestone for LINK? For example what is the story on version 1.0.0, what is its significance?
Did Sergey give a talk at the end of the year or was the talk they posted just a repeat of something from earlier?
So why does BTC still lead the market?
What is with the FUD around the staking mechanism? The "it will never be released" thing?
What? We just witnessed a massive financial corporation completely manipulating an unregulated market
Will everyone just keep being obsessed with BTC or ETH? Will real utility capture ever matter?
How does a node know which committee to talk to for which transactions?
Why does it feel like we will drop forever? Is this the purpose of the manipulation, to fuck with our heads?
I look at my portfolio for the first time in days and I'm like WTF?
So what is the deal with Arbitrum? Are Chainlink nodes acting as validators or not?
Let's say BTC drops. Then what actions are taken that lead to a LINK drop?