209 похожих чатов

Https://Gov.Frax.Finance/T/Fip-71-100-Full-Collateralization-Though-Fraxlend-Seniorage/1391/13?U=Liscivia_honey_dao

8 ответов

19 просмотров

I really love the FRAX community. But this has got to be the 50th time you post this link, which to put it mildly is about 48 more than the usual. You are suggesting a massive, fundamental, change to FRAX, which seems to be dividing the community. Before I conclude on my own I am curious. I have never seen you in the TG before the UST crash, and no-one has ever suggested to move to 100% CR, so I get a bad vibe from your extreme activity in the group as it makes me suspicious. Let this be my invitation for more transparency about you.

MBDenmark
I really love the FRAX community. But this has got...

I think it's okay to be enthusiastic, especially if you feel you found something neat. There are a lot of "new" people in the chat lately...totally expected given what happened in the ecosystem. It's def the case that many people were suggesting 100% CR, even @samkazemian was, so this should not cause pause. Follow your curiosity and let's judge the ideas on their merits and not appeal to authority/familiarity. I know you are doing that anyway...mostly nodding in agreement. Interesting times and we should def wait for clarity and consensus.

This proposal is utter bullshit

Liscivia- Автор вопроса
MBDenmark
I really love the FRAX community. But this has got...

Well, that is bcs I had the idea during the crash. I think the idea is good so I wanted to express it to the community, I think the engagement is fairly low on that proposal (which I need to edit to make a discussion) so when I see the opportunity to invite somebody to check it out I do so bcs I think it's in the interest of making things better and, lastly I'm trying to explain it as much as I can bcs I think it's fairly complicated and people might have a hard time. Btw the CR wouldn't need to be moved to 100% in what I proposed. The protocol would always be 100% solvent which is another thing all together. My model is about keeping all that FRAX has built up until now intact and maintain the fractional reserve model + argument it and balance it out with the lending side to make it more resilient.

Lordwadsworth
Sam actually did

Thanks, I did see that. It's Sam's style. I love it. He voices a proposal as a thought, and if it gets shut down, he hasn't lost any credibility 😀. Fantastic way to activate the community.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

For all those that keep asking why no pump? why this ? and why that...? Please close ur ewt chart and open 2 others - TOTAL (total mc) and BTC.D (btc dominance). Maybe BTC a...
Inn3r_G
19
"Since pnut can flip FTM easily, I'm swapping my FTM to pnut and hoping for a easy x5-x10" Perfect recipe for disaster. NFA but chances are, you'll end up as exit liquidity ...
C. A.
7
AMD status update? No longer in the plan but something might be around the corner later on Chinese partner? No longer in the plan. This market does not seem to be the top ...
Ben
6
I get confused when people talk about the ‘bull market’ and the ‘next bull market’ as if anyone really has a clue what’s really going on in the world. First of all - there i...
Shah
1
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
With fxs we dont need to do anything ? Just the ticker will change ?
Captn
13
@marycamacho @NATHANLENAE @popachubby It was said that HOT will be used for hosting payments. But HOT is ERC20 based. So slow and high paying. The ERC network does not seem ve...
Aragorn
17
. . Guys why Litecoin listed under the Memecoin section ?? .
ᛗᛟᛊᛏᚨᚠᚨ Ⓜ️ MEMES
8
Another way to think about it is like this: let's say we sell $100m of FXB2029 and another $100m of FXB2055 and we buy $200m of ETH with it. Do you think that ETH price will b...
Sam Kazemian ¤⛓️¤
20
Please what is your price prediction?
The John John Yes
6
Карта сайта