Here'S what I don't understand about the sLoad problem. I get

Question

Here'S what I don't understand about the sLoad problem. I get

that if pls gets expensive the same problem can occur on pulsechain in the future.

To that people say "unless by then the ethereum Devs change something".

My question is: why can't pulsechain Devs work on a way to change it? Is there an unwritten rule that anything updated on pulsechain must first be changed on ethereum? Why?

Or is it that the ethereum Devs are just better?

Why is this roadblock incumbent on the other "team" to fix it?

#cryptocurrency #english #hex-crypto

0

13.03.2024

10 ответов

34 просмотра

Tezz ⬣⎔ Hex ⎔⬣ [I won't DM you]

https://twitter.com/RichardHeartWin/status/1767753191213428994?t=-KHtK4cG3-4hlVvweD_lDQ&s=19

0

13.03.2024

Tezz ⬣⎔ Hex ⎔⬣ [I won't DM you]

There's no incentive to fix it. High SLOAD is a feature, not a bug, in the eyes of those who implemented it. Regarded by many as 'Security theatre'.

0

13.03.2024

Tob23 23 Автор вопроса

Adam
Pulsechain will probably never big as big as Ether...

Thanks. I guess more specifically I should ask this: On pulsechain, can Devs change the code without worrying about some sort of approval or preemptive change from Devs on ethereum side? Lets say one day a pulsechain dev has a genius idea to fix a problem (sLoad is just an example. Could be anything), are they allowed to deploy the changes on pulsechain and have no connection at all to any alterations on ethereum?

0

13.03.2024

Combot

Tob23 23
Thanks. I guess more specifically I should ask thi...

Tob23 23 (11) has increased reputation of Adam (1)

0

13.03.2024

Tob23 23 Автор вопроса

Tezz ⬣⎔ Hex ⎔⬣ [I won't DM you]
There's no incentive to fix it. High SLOAD is a fe...

Oh, I see. Perhaps then I'm more curious about any changes in the future. Can pulsechain, now that it's separate from ethereum, be altered irrespective of ethereum code changes?

0

13.03.2024

Tezz ⬣⎔ Hex ⎔⬣ [I won't DM you]

Tob23 23
Oh, I see. Perhaps then I'm more curious about an...

Potentially, read the Richard Heart tweet I linked above. PLS would esentially have to 14,000x for SLOAD to be as bad of a problem. Perhaps now is an opportunity to accumulate. 14,000x is only a bad thing if you don't have any

0

13.03.2024

Nenad [I won't dm you]

The cost of EVM calculations can be reduced by a fork. But we are very far from needing to change costs on Pulsechain. While on Ethereum the Ethereum foundation keeps on increasing the costs of computations. The higher the cost, the better their network utility token price performance as people spend more.

0

13.03.2024

Adam

Tob23 23
Thanks. I guess more specifically I should ask thi...

I think it's always a concern, but miniscule things like bigger blocks (which already have), isn't a big deal. I hope we see dynamic blocks that monero has. I think it's fantastic for evening out the blockchain.

0

13.03.2024

Combot

Adam
I think it's always a concern, but miniscule thing...

This chat promotes HEX. Concern trolls are removed on sight.

0

13.03.2024

Adam · Accepted Answer

Adam

Pulsechain will probably never big as big as Ethereum, that's how we keep gas costs down. If it happens anyways we'd just increase blocks and sLoad even at the cost of centralization. Pulsechain was created to serve Hexicans after all.

0

13.03.2024

209 похожих чатов

Here'S what I don't understand about the sLoad problem. I get

10 ответов

Похожие вопросы