So Dan twisted my posts in unofficial and deleted my

response so will see how long the post is live in here.

I started with

I totally understand. It is frustrating. What concerns me and I don’t know if I should be worried is that unibright have said that they were clever enough to bank the money made and have years of funding available (FACT). They don’t hold any ubt (This might be incorrect but I am sure I read that they said they sold all of their ubt) Also they have a successful consulting business selling services that don’t need ubt such as Unibright One (FACT) . So what incentive do they have for pushing ubt (Genuine question)

I followed with
Unless you want ubt to be used? If no incentive to sell solutions which use ubt then why bother. (Genuine question)

I followed with

If funding raised from ico of ubt has enabled them to develop over the years and produce Unibright One, (FACT) why could they have not incorporated some way benefiting ubt token? (Genuine question)

Followed with
Have done the research. Latest medium post even states no-one is wanting the ubt discount. (Incorrect as not no-one. Should have said MAJORITY of people are not wanting the ubt discount, still worrying)

Not sure where you got the following from the above
You started with why don't team give any utility! What is their incentive!
Now it is "I've done my research, I would like more people to use the token for discount"

Read the facts above. Read the genuine questions above and give answers instead of trying to twist things and avoiding the key points.

The majority of customers are using Unibright One without the need for ubt?
Unibright have years of funding raised from ubt ico.
Unibright have a successful business selling Unibright One which does not need to use ubt?
Unibright business seems to be in a good position and growing without the need to utilise ubt.

Are any of these statements incorrect. Please correct me if so.

More worrying is when you ask these questions your posts are removed.

I notice that you come up with a whole string of comments and that you now think you should have an answer to each one. A lot of things you name indicate that Unibright is not doing a good job, and that you are dissatisfied. I'm afraid I'm not going to take this away by going to answer your comments.

I unfortunately don’t expect to get an answer to the factual comments I made but it would have been nice to. What I don’t like is admins deleting posts that are factual but don’t fit their narrative.

I like facts. And no point in repeating what I already said. No need for you to repeat yourself. Conversation was over

where in this rambling post is the question?

What incentive have Unibright got to increase usage of ubt? They have a successful business model with Unibright One which does not need ubt

If you are going to keep going with this, then it will have to be a mute. Baseledger needs UBT, licences require UBT, consulting fees can be paid with UBT for discount, UBT can be used with UB One for a discount.

Someone asked me a question and I replied so there was a need to repeat as they did not see the question.

I'm with you on this. I really don't get why the team would push UBT

Yet here they are, building many utilities for the token.

its the token that powers everything Are u asking why dont they artificially pump the token w/ chainlink style fake poc's and buying coindesk articles and youtubers and stuff? Thats because no large VC group invested in it and pumps the price to endlessly dump on u. Its always been like that, nothing new.