or user interaction? For the growth of a network.
We haven't experienced paid for corporate utility yet so it's not really a question is it? As it stands, it would have to be user interaction, which I am guessing you mean retail. If and when that comes, clearly corporate use cases would dwarf retail.
Some talk about network effect. Network usage by the number of users would drive the value of a network.
That's what I just said. As it stands. But it will be dwarfed by enterprise use cases if and when we get them live and paid for.
I agree. Retail has been propping up the price of HBAR and retail is too small to move the needle much in terms of HBAR price. Retail is also getting exhausted (same people buying, not enough new buyers). This is evidenced also by lack of wallet growth, RSI, fear/greed index, etc. IF, and I say IF, some of the GC members actually have to purchase HBAR on the open market for their supposed use cases, THEN the price may really start to move. Enterprise money vastly outweighs retail. Additionally, there has been ZERO institutional investment into Hedera. This is evidenced by VC 's investing in other layer 1's (Solana ETH, etc) and Blackrock tokenizing on ETH etc. IF and again a big IF Hedera can get some institutional investment, THEN the HBAR price will move. Investors also see that TPS is at 1,400 and know that the network needs 10,000 just to get to "breakeven". Meaning the network needs to on-board another 8 massive use cases the size of ATMA just to not lose money. I think Hedera really needs to look at raising their fees or really start putting through some TPS/ use cases.
Обсуждают сегодня