210 похожих чатов

11 ответов

14 просмотров

They are unlocked, and usable by the ultra team, for the specific usecases you can find in this article But coingecko and coinmarketcap doesnt count it as circulating until it mooves

GodGiven ᕫ
They are unlocked, and usable by the ultra team, f...

Is there scope for the Ultra team to engage in additional private funding rounds in order to turn the large UOS reserves into usable capital to fund initiatives? I.e. rather than put sell pressure on the open market, you liquidate UOS into USD via private sales, which is then allocated towards initiatives such as exclusive game deals. It’s a big war chest, but the team are also incentivised for the value of that war chest to increase, so avoiding public market sell pressure I imagine would be a priority so it’s not working against itself.

Alex Harper
Is there scope for the Ultra team to engage in add...

Hey So I'm not sure about that I know for sure they will be revamping the tokenomics in Q2 and that may bring some answers you are looking for They should adress those concerns in the coming revamp, let's wait and see

Alex Harper
Is there scope for the Ultra team to engage in add...

This is not a good idea, at best they relock tokens for trust (tokenomics revamp soon). Having VCs or OTC sales will not prevent them from reselling to the market. And if $UOS increases in value this should benefit Ultra’s cash flow. The only interesting case is if Ultra needs a large sum right away.

NWD | Ultra Times
This is not a good idea, at best they relock token...

Well I guess private sales could come with vesting terms, but it’s more about attracting net positive liquidity in. And you’d hope they would be selected for their aligned vision or longer term commitments anyway. If private investors sell after injecting liquidity initially, it’s a relatively neutral impact, but simply liquidating UOS on open market is purely net negative liquidity, which would be working against their likely goal of having the treasury build in value so that it can be more effectively allocated in the future to higher-value initiatives.

I think I'm thinking of a situation where Ultra may want to make a USD commitment to an initiative, such as funding an exclusive game development. One route would be to liquidate UOS on open market and give the USD direct to game developers, or give them the UOS for them to liquidate themselves in their own time. But both create sell pressure and suck liquidity out of the open market. A private investment route means they bring in the USD capital via an OTC for example, in exchange for the UOS, which can then be allocated directly to the initiative. This does not suck liquidity out of the open market because there is no sell pressure. That's what I mean when I say that that would help avoid the application of the UOS treasury working against its own value accrual on the open market.

Alex Harper
I think I'm thinking of a situation where Ultra ma...

Ok I see, in this case, we would need to find a private investor willing to take the risk of buying OTC with a fairly long vesting period. Maybe with a heavy discount. This would remove the downward pressure and allow $UOS to increase in value and Ultra to better finance itself on the open market.

NWD | Ultra Times
Ok I see, in this case, we would need to find a pr...

We’ll see what they do with the Tokenomics Revamp. I have no doubt they are aware of the challenge discussed.

Alex Harper
We’ll see what they do with the Tokenomics Revamp....

I'm kind of curious about it too 👀 Q2 on the RM.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта