209 похожих чатов

We can't transfer SDN from MM to JS yet? Just tried

it using extrinsics but didn't withdraw

28 ответов

55 просмотров

See video transfer SDN from MM to Js

Jack- Автор вопроса

It logs as sent on metamask and subscan but the balance on js is not updating

Jack- Автор вопроса

Im not sending to exchanges. Sending from mm to .js

Yes. MM to js is a 2 step process. 1. Convert js address to H160, send SDN from mm to that h160 address. 2. Connect receiving wallet to polkadot.js web app and execute evm call.

Jack- Автор вопроса

That's exactly what I did. Tried withdrawing using extrinsics and straight from mm but doesn't work

What's the rationale of sending to another wallet? Can't we just use the same private key for ss58 and h160?

Jack- Автор вопроса

Via extrinsics? Yes

Jack- Автор вопроса

But I have sufficient balance

Use the same private key in which u generated ur ss58 address to also generate a h160 version

Are you trying to send all SDN from MM?

Jack- Автор вопроса

Can I DM?

sure

You can send SDN to any H160 address converted from H160 to S58. And withdrawing SDN from address H160 to SS58 similarly does not need the same private key to perform.

Jack- Автор вопроса

DMed

I mean I get it, but I can save existential deposit and transaction fees if I have just 1 wallet in the first place. Like why use 2 wallet when I can use 1?

You can convert SS58 to H160 on same private key but cannot convert "H160 converted" to SS58 it will give error because "H160 converted" has truncated data in address

? Sorry, I don't get you 😅

Are you trying to say this? Because the problem has been resolved already. https://docs.moonbeam.network/learn/features/unified-accounts/

Its a one way conversion from SS58 (Shiden) to H160 (Metamask) due to information loss while converting.

Yes, from what I understand its just because the standards are different, but it should be still possible to use the same private key as long as the devs do a little tweak to the underlying cryptographical algorithm used

It's very difficult if possible, we did from the beginning the security of Substrate and Ethereum

Moonbeam already did it, since their code is open source, maybe just copy-paste the code 🙃

They are a version of ETH that's not surprising

Yeah, thank you anyways. I understand it will not be straight forward and would involve many man hours to achieve it since Astar is supporting much more functionalities than what Moonbeam is doing. Will help out if I can as this is definitely possible and will make everyone lifes easier

We're still looking for simple solutions that everyone can do.👍

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта