Well there’s the word “use” in “use case”
So, what your implying is that even though OMG has a use case, it’s not really a use case because I personally have never used it. Your logic astounds me yet again.
You haven’t used it because no one uses it. That’s the point. Its use case is not used by anyone. Zero transactions. Ergo worthless use case
Again. Your logic is asinine, but no point going around in circles with you. You believe if there’s a tree in the forest that falls over and no one sees it fall, then it didn’t really fall. Stupid, Common Core, removed from reality logic.
I didn’t day it’s not a use case i said it’s a worthless use case
Обсуждают сегодня