to scale to keep up with modular rollup centric designs such as eth2?
Hello jagdeep, I suggest heading over to Evan's YouTube channel where he goes into zk-SNARKS vs Rollups and more. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX_gSlR5Cbw&t=103s
Thanks, however it doesn't answer my question. In order for Mina to scale it will have to do zkRollups itself.. its an intuition I have come to maybe he hasn't thought about it yet. If its not possible thats why i was curious as to why not if its turing complete on l1 it can effectively host other rollups. I had some questions on his comments here: Mina is used for efficient privacy through recursive proofs whereas zkRollups provide speed, why cannot zkRollups offer this efficient privacy? (it is just 1 field multiplier afaik to achieve privacy to already existing STARK/SNARK mechanisms used in rollups). The mina bridge with eth (which seems like btcrelay but for mina) how does eth chain get validated in mina (is the recursive proof of eth chain possible? if so is there a source for this? I don't think that exists but that is an exciting breakthrough if it exists). Why can't this recursion exist on zkrollup's that exist in Mina?
Hello Jagdeep, you have a good list of questions there. What I can do is submit some of these questions to them team. As they are very technical questions, I can direct you to our Discord channel as there are many fellow Mina enthusiasts, you may find some of the answers there already. Would you like me to provide you a link to our Discord?
does Mina discord still use that phone number verification? if so i will not be going there last time it messed up my discord and kicked me off my own discord and I now have to use web discord the desktop one doesn't work anymore for me
I'm not sure why it would've done that to your Discord. Did you have mobile Discord on your phone?
Обсуждают сегодня