So for FXS on polygon - are these BOTH valid

Question

So for FXS on polygon - are these BOTH valid

contract addresses? one is listed in the frax docs (0x1a3acf6d19267e2d3e7f898f42803e90c9219062), the other is from some kind of matic mapper (0x3e121107f6f22da4911079845a470757af4e1a1b), and it looks like frax finance is the largest holder. ARe these both freely traded and valid, or should one take precedent over the other? Looks like Sushi farms use the mapper version, not the official version.

#cryptocurrency #english #frax

0

11.11.2021

4 ответов

12 просмотров

4 years locked. veMAXI (as a millionaire)

i didnt check the addresses, but on all chains that are not ETH there will be bridged coins and chain native ones, they have the same value but are on different contracts so some exchanges / lending sites will only work with 1 of the contracts .

0

11.11.2021

hlniv 🍏 Автор вопроса

Travis Moore | Co-Founder @ Frax (¤³, ¤³)
The former is the canonical. The latter is the bri...

thanks - i see

0

11.11.2021

hlniv 🍏 Автор вопроса

4 years locked. veMAXI (as a millionaire)
i didnt check the addresses, but on all chains tha...

ok got it. i understand. 🙏

0

11.11.2021