209 похожих чатов

Atomic composability, at scale A second significant hurdle to overcome is

scaling. Conventional blockchain platforms support limited transaction throughput. Many different scaling solutions exist and have been proposed, but they typically have one or other shortcoming associated with them. The so-called Scalability Trilemma states that it is difficult to scale a blockchain platform while maintaining decentralisation and security. Solutions including larger blocks, a smaller number of validators, and sharding have all been suggested or are being implemented.

There is another issue to factor in: composability. DeFi is so powerful because open-source dApps can be reused, modified and plugged into existing dApps to access existing functionality and network effect – adding value to the ecosystem as a whole. Certain applications, including those that use flash loans or involve instant arbitrage, require atomic composability: the property whereby all relevant transactions are executed successfully, or else none are. Certain scaling solutions – including some forms of sharding and L2 platforms – can introduce friction and complexity, meaning that atomic composability does not work reliably or at all.

The challenge for blockchain is not just to scale, but to maintain atomic composability at scale. Ergo is not currently seeking to scale by implementing untested technologies for now. Instead, it aims to use the ‘headroom’ that is still available for conventional blockchain platforms by using resources more intelligently. Solutions include NiPoPoWs and storage rent, as well as featuring an open governance process that avoids the need for contentious hardforks to upgrade the network.

https://bitcoingarden.org/forum/index.php?topic=84073.msg533622#msg533622

3 ответов

30 просмотров

So am I reading this correctly? Ergo will maintain composability by not implementing those scaling solutions and using NiPoPoWs instead

Glasgow|WON’T DM- Автор вопроса
TMR.ΣRG
So am I reading this correctly? Ergo will maintain...

Yeah there's more options of level 1 to scale while we wait for a L2 winner. Or maybe multiple will be implemented in different domains

Glasgow|WON’T DM
Yeah there's more options of level 1 to scale whil...

mhmm good strategy - think some more technical-oriented people would try to compare us with Radix on the L1 scaling aspect

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта