think about in this space.
It's getting a bit murky now as to whether Celer is to be seen as an L2 project? Or something else.
Maybe the team can put out a vision page to state simply what they see themselves as in a more 'tangible' description (i.e., bringing mass adoption to blockchain - but get into details the what and the how)
cBridge’s SDK isn going to act as middleware will enable dapps to operate cross-chain seamlessly. How many, or which L2s will be near irrelevant because the average user won’t know what chain they’re on, just like they don’t know their IP or DNS when they are using a web2 app like Facebook.
That's from inter-connecting networks, which is great and is something that's very important in this space. The topic above is more about the scaling solution for Ethereum (and/or other L1s in the future). What does Celer team think about the Endgame article that Vitalik posted? And from a pure L2 perspective, what role does Celer play in that space?
Do you mean like zk and stark rollups?
No, not quite. The above was in response to the user, 준호 국, bringing up the various layer2 scaling for Ethereum - and whether there will be a single rollup for Eth going forward My point was to understand what Celer wants the people to see them as? Going back a few months, people consider Celer first and foremost an L2 solution. Now people see Celer as a bridge. Specifically for L2 space, where does Celer think they fit in?
There will be many L2s. There will never be one single rollup for ethereum. Celer will be middleware. I feel like I answer what Celer will act as, and the follow up question was but what will it act as? Celer is going to act as middleware will enable dapps to operate cross-chain seamlessly. How many, or which L2s (and rollups) will be near irrelevant because the average user won’t know what chain they’re on, just like they don’t know their IP or DNS when they are using a web2 app like Facebook.
Обсуждают сегодня