you mine only 3 blocks in 21 days
Why they will feel comfortable delegating their address. to your node?
Please end this conversation now. You might want to consider a different approach on how you give those reports as not to rub people the wrong way. This has been an ongoing issue which Richie has explained to you the last time.
you impose your opinion. your message looks like a mandatory requirement to leave these validators. it goes against the values of our community.
I wrote above that I did not recommend anything this time, I only indicated that one validator does not pay due to a possibly low balance Some Validators don’t like my work and don’t like it, as UpTime thinks, so they wanted to pour all their negative points into my aders, since I don’t have much power ... I only posted the table today, but the Validators have hinted at old posts that were written long before Richie's post. I won't answer anymore But TOP-50 (according to my conditions, I will continue to publish in the future) Nobody has the right to forbid me
how about @Leonid_LEO83 message with list of validators, which can lead to misunderstanding?
While data presented to the community might be helpful, side comments telling people to leave certain validators or calling them out will certainly be taken as something else. If it goes against the rules and values of this community then we uphold our rights as well. Thank you.
This has actually been escalated for further review.
is this not a recommendation? are you kidding? this is an aggressive ultimatum statement, especially from ex-moderator
he has not said to delegate to someone perticular
it does not matter. it harmed the listed validators
any way people loose delegations
it does not matter
Обсуждают сегодня