209 похожих чатов

The EU wants to build its own DNS resolver called

“DNS4EU.”

The European Commission published a call for proposals that included details about the government-run DNS resolver on January 12, 2022. The call for proposals contained more than enough information to predict the direction of this project. But their goals are straightforward enough.

,,The deployment of DNS4EU aims to address such consolidation of DNS resolution in the hands of a few companies, which renders the resolution process itself vulnerable in case of significant events affecting one major provider."

They actually published the plans for the DNS resolver in December 2020 as a part of the “EU’s Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade.” The 2020 document contains much of the same language:

“[P]eople and organizations in the EU increasingly rely on a few public DNS resolvers operated by non-EU entities. Such consolidation of DNS resolution in the hands of a few companies renders the resolution process itself vulnerable in case of significant events affecting one major provider and makes it more difficult for EU authorities to address possible malicious cyberattacks and major geopolitical and technical incidents.”

The call for proposals listed the project requirements. Most of the requirements are standard. The concept of feature parity comes to mind. At the site, the list of requirements includes a short description of the requirement. Since the majority of the features are not interesting to me, I will simply include a concise summary instead of the entire requirement’s description.

- High adoption rate through targetting the entire EU as a customer base;
- High reliability and uptime, as well as low latency of DNS resolution;
- Broad accessibility (low barrier of entry);
- “Widely discoverable” by users and services;
- Opt-in paid premium services for enhanced security;
- Opt-in and fully transparent parental control filtering services;
- To include the “latest DNS security and privacy-enhancing technologies”;
GDPR compliant;
- A federated infrastructure spread throughout the EU
- “State-of-the-art protection against cybersecurity threats by blocking malware, phishing and other threats”;
- To include DoT and DoH and be fully IPv6 compliant;
- No monetization of personal data

And you knew it was coming:

- “Lawful filtering: Filtering of URLs leading to illegal content based on legal requirements applicable in the EU or national jurisdictions (e.g. based on court orders), in full compliance with EU rules.”

This seems like a pointless exercise on its own. Perhaps they will introduce legislation that requires people to obtain a license to change their DNS resolver? How silly.

TorrentFreak pointed to an oddity. “[I]t will offer better security options for “customers” who pay, which seems strange for a government-backed service.”

I can’t envision a world where people voluntarily switch to an (openly) state-controlled DNS resolver. The existence of premium options makes me think that individuals might not actually be the targeted userbase here. Would a large corporation pay the government to do the DNS thing? Probably.

3 ответов

14 просмотров

9.9.9.9

Hansonis- Автор вопроса

Yes I used Quad9 too. But then this happened: https://torrentfreak.com/dns-resolver-quad9-loses-first-pirate-site-blocking-appeal-in-germany-211206/

Hansonis
Yes I used Quad9 too. But then this happened: http...

The .torrent files still connect to peers, you just find a mirror..

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта