anything, your arbitrary exponential factor is the most unfair, random, and unsustainable idea.
There is not any rational that justify that, you are excluding 99% of your community to participate, and you did not learn from current events ?
Listen to community and propose at least one with b=1
You can swap proportionaly to your investment, simple as that, whales not enough spoiled by that fact ?
There are several factors why SC swap may not be affordable, on a large scale, for everyone. There are safety factors related to SC Waves drainage and also factors that influence USDN stability in pools. There are many variables involved and the Neutrino team is aware and studied these elements to develop the product in the current characteristics. We can vote to change some parameters and that's good because it doesn't modify the product in its essence, it just updates according to the needs of the moment.
We saw that it has been thoroughly studied with last update and beneficial to usdn stabity. About the risks of instant swap, you are creating in fact a risk to allow massiv swaps because they can drain the contract by exploiting the oracle, (short selling, suppressing then swapping) This was not the case with random swap, and it is not the case neither with average users swapping less than 100k
The thing that you did not get is to reduce the risk you need to limit the size of swap for whales, not increase it. Little balances are not dangerous because they cannot create any slippage or price manipulation as they pay transaction gas fees relatively higher to a whale, it is not someone swapping 10 usdn which will create a risk, if you really want to add an exponential factor, it needs to be below 1
Yea so does this proposal help whales more than little guy? Just like everything else so far like liquidation threshold proposal and 40% limit on usdt/c borrows..
Обсуждают сегодня