209 похожих чатов

So whats next? slowly SC is drained from waves with

low usdn to waves fee as right now selling waves is easiest way to do sc arb, maybe we should introduce usdn to waves liquid fee which increases the closer br to 1 is (@ <= 100% BR fee is 2%)? If BR over 1,7 fee could be 0.5% as it is now?

4 ответов

22 просмотра

Hi, Aleksander, I’ll pass your idea to the team, thank you =)

Well it has to be seen whether the whale will pump waves again as we have seen in the previous period since all eyes are on him now. He cannot hide it either since the 300k NSBT wallet has it's NSBT locked for 4 years and setting up another wallet is very expensive. The point that I want to make here is that the whale accounted for 90%+ of the NSBT revenues in the past period. Those days might be over now so lowering the fee will only tank the NSBT rewards even further, also taking down the NSBT price. The whale was capable of locking waves % from 49% to like 58% in a matter of two/three weeks and with the new rules even with favorable arbitrage conditions we are only very slowly declining from 58% locked to 57%. So there is simply too little swap power in the market to sustain the whale swapping volume. Therefore, from revenue perspective we could argue to increase the 2% instead of lowering it

Jan
Well it has to be seen whether the whale will pump...

In terms of nsbt value (and revenues), we are just getting started I guess. More functionality and revenues have already been hinted at

Aleksandr-Beloussov Автор вопроса
Jan
Well it has to be seen whether the whale will pump...

dunno where u get 90% revenues as fee revenue is distributed equally between all gnsbt holders based on gnsbt share, meaning that 300k gnsbt receiving back bout 1/7 of the fees collected. Right now usdn to waves is 0.5% fee which means if usdt(c) to usdn ratio will sustain at 1,005+ higher value it is always fastest way to arbitrage via selling waves increasing its sale pressure. And such sale is very good for big whale as he can grab all the cheap waves. If we do not allow for the arbitrage to happen in case of increased usdn to waves fees, smaller nsbt holders won't be arbing via selling their waves which is why close to BR 1 ratio fees needs to be higher than possible usdt(c) to usdn ratio.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта