in the past few days? were those redeem for usdc+fxs or? is there any way to see those transactions on chain?
https://t.me/fraxfinance/197890
just read that, thanks, is there anywhere to see how much FRAX is owned by protocol and how much is in hands of other entities?
It was the AMOs pulling frax to help balance the curve pool
dune.xyz/seba/Frax
I agree AMOs' CR should be 100% but for current FRAX = USDC + FXS with market decided CR works well in the past, volatility days. It is great assets to frax, are we going to throw away for ever?
It’s an upgrade imo, as we still get the benefit of additional yield generation through credit, without actually being undercollateralized. And times have changed after this event; being able to say frax is 100% collateralized can dispel a lot of fud and potential attack (literal and political) vectors
but frax does very well in past couple of days, please explain why need this upgrade
It’s a risk reduction measure that avoids much of the fud and actual Attack risks that an undercollateralized stable has; it also depends on using the equity token to back liability, which can be improved. Using a debt model on top of a fully collateralized stable is safer and cleaner in my view. @samkazemian likely has far more developed thoughts on this; I just took his thought and drafted them after realizing the value in this approach
I do agree frax should reduce risks rn, but if the same in bull market will kill frax' growth.
We can adjust later and work on the mechanics. Could just increase the credit ratio in that case
Обсуждают сегодня