an article saying stablecoins may be forced to hold reserves at the fed or smthing, how would that affect frax? Would it have to/be looking to comply if something like this came up?
That would actually be something we would be extremely interested in doing. If the Fed gave FRAX a master depository account, I think that would cement FRAX as a pillar of onchain dollar stability. I am skeptical if the Fed will do that as they do not give any banks even master accounts, but that would be beyond bullish if it was offered to leading onchain stablecoins.
Sounds great! Is there any mechanic or Avenue through which the fed or any other regulator could force frax to shut down or impede its operations in any way?
I'm not aware of any reason why they would. In fact, I think it would make more sense to have regulators offer leading stablecoins Fed depository accounts and let them have direct treasury yields than to shut them down. It would stifle innovation and technology to outright shut them down. If we were offered a Fed master account, we'd be extremely interested.
That makes sense to me. Only concerns I have is if some uncommon sense policy was to be passed to crackdown on decentralised stables like frax or dai
That would be so cool the government working with frax
Обсуждают сегодня