frax of "idle" USDC that gets deployed by the AMOs?
I think I understand part.
FRAX = partial USDC that FRAX Protocol keeps on it's books
When someone puts FRAX in an LP, they are indirectly tying up that USDC backing.
When a person comes over and stakes/locks up their FRAX/ASSETS LP token on the FRAX Platform, this gives the FRAX platform the go ahead to deploy that USDC because they now know it doesn't have to be redeemed for X days.
This USDC earns revenue, which in turn gets distrubuted somehow to FXS token holders in the form of buyback and burns.
Do I have this right?
lp staking != protocol owned collateral
Right. I never said it was.
Обсуждают сегодня