209 похожих чатов

10 ответов

10 просмотров

only on a tiny pool of fxs, but yes

DS
only on a tiny pool of fxs, but yes

This is the correct answer and right way to think about it.

no, it will be the average price on all pools with a liquidity bias, so will be much nearer to the other markets

Sam Kazemian ¤⛓️¤
This is the correct answer and right way to think ...

does this mean liquidity balance needs to be fixed going forward? i will probably just keep the fxs, but if this persisted over time and/or was constant, particularly in a bear market, someone would just keep dumping whatever they get elsewhere to arb it

DS
does this mean liquidity balance needs to be fixed...

No that's part of the design though. The point of the TWAMM is you can sell into it over time. The reason the FXS price is lower on Fraxswap is becasue someone is using a TWAMM to sell it their FXS slowly and smoothly over time. So for 24 hours the price of FXS on Fraxswap will be like $5 and be arb'd to the other markets. Instead, if that person sold all their FXS in 1 tx at once in Uniswap they would take down the price there to like $3 and then back up to $6 after the market absorbs the difference in price. Right now, the TWAMM allows the guy to sell over his desired period and have the market absorb the price from $5 back up to $6 over a 24 hour period (or whatever period he selected).

Sam Kazemian ¤⛓️¤
No that's part of the design though. The point of ...

right, so the FXS side is much heavier than the FRAX side, hence the discount, until it gets more balanced and thus price moves towards other AMMs?

DS
right, so the FXS side is much heavier than the FR...

Yes exactly right. It should be much healthier in price action once their TWAMM and selling is done obviously.

Похожие вопросы

Карта сайта