say that they want to prevent big stablecoin blowups in the future and are mentioning luna/ust (algo stable) as a reason for this: how fucked is frax/fxs? Whats the best argument for saying not fucked at all?
Luna/ust was purely onchain. Preventing future blowups a la luna/ust basically sounds like banning algo stables? Sure, this is not really enforcable, but still... not good?
Basically my best 'not fucked at all' argument would be: regulators are misusing luna/ust blowup to argue that fiat backed stables (usdt, usdc, etc.) should be properly regulated. Which would be a net positive Id say. But how likely is this scenario? Thoughts?
You may refer to this as this is frequently asked question https://t.me/fraxfinance/205050
Thanks, I have read that as well. I agree re blacklisting etc. But my question is a bit broader and isnt answered in that post from Sam
No one with a (positive) thought on this?
Обсуждают сегодня