Kava is half decentralised at the moment, the voting power between kava labs and exchanges is ridiculously high for an L1 chain. Also the number of validators required to maintain the network is extremely low compared to ethereum (due to the nature of cosmos SDK) but this is similar to other cosmos chains
kava isnot decentralization better saying only in interface and showoff its decentralization but in reality its more likely private company behave(like centralization)
what on earth are you talking about? Kava chain has 100+ independent valdiators. validators are run by different enteties, some of them are majors such as Binance, Kraken or Cosmostation, but there are a lot another validators with as many voting power.
tell to those of 100 independent valdiators to submit one proposal and passing it without team aggrement if they could do it then you will understand how they are independent in kava platform😏
Decentralisation is an issue for kava. Consensus can be achieved with a handful of validators.
Обсуждают сегодня