zkEVM and SNARKtor have shown promise, the delay in delivering EVM 2.0—a cornerstone of the ecosystem—is a growing concern. The heavy investment in conferences and promoting the Telos ethos hasn’t translated into meaningful adoption or usage, and the lack of interest is becoming more apparent. At the same time, hiring more developers and increasing operational costs without driving demand only amplifies the financial strain.
Marketing’s core goal is to bring users to the chain, yet any mention of improving marketing efforts seems to be dismissed. Why the resistance to a strategy that could bring growth? Spending resources on initiatives with clear ROI would allow for greater reinvestment down the line, but the current approach feels like we’re wasting money and digging ourselves deeper.
For a chain with the potential to be in the top 100, brushing off these issues is not the attitude we need. Prioritize delivering polished products, and prove Telos' worth through action, not promises. It’s getting old already, and clearly the market does not care about Telos or what Telos is building, otherwise that would translate to more followers/users.
what I've been saying ad nauseum. instead of considering what holders want you'll get answers like "you're not looking at FDV", "we're building something concrete for the future" or my personal favorite "marketing is for meme coins". you can cure cancer, if no one knows about it, no one knows about it. it's not rocket science. God knows how much John has spent on conferences out of his own pocket only to hold that over our heads. "You know how much I've personally spent to get Telos to these conferences??" Cool, no one asked for that.
Обсуждают сегодня