upon the process (if at all possible) if a hack occurs? It's unfortunate that this time relayer screwed it for Frax
I think I agree with Westwood that we shouldn't support bridges other than L2 bridges (which are just fraud proofs). Writing this as a FIP as we speak.
Things should decided on a case by case basis, bridges can be sus, and we should hold them to a very high standard
At the end of the day, FXS holders have to decide through governance but I'd strongly recommend no bridges swapping to canFRAX or canFXS other than full fraud proof L2 bridges.
Is there currently a full-fraud proof L2 bridges or are you referring to a future time?
can you help me understand how/why L2 bridges are safer than these other bridges? A bit of a newb on the technical side
https://twitter.com/VitalikButerin/status/1479501366192132099?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1479501366192132099%7Ctwgr%5Ea9eb4f2a743aa365211c8d2936c125b093913ebe%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fcryptoslate.com%2Fvitalik-buterin-on-why-cross-chain-bridges-will-not-be-a-part-of-the-multi-chain-future%2F
Обсуждают сегодня