strategy after the USDC incident and the unreliability of the centralized stablecoins? I think one of you mentioned increasing the collateral of frxETH to replace the USDC share… is this real and viable in the horizon of 2-3 years? @samkazemian can you pls share your preliminary thoughts and brainstorming ideas on this pls?
This might provide insight ser :) https://t.me/fraxfinance/259716
So is there any alternative plan concerning the increasing ETH collateral to maintain the peg (similar to LUSD) or at least start replacing USDC by LUSD itself?
From my understanding it's a balancing act. Too much eth exposure causes scalability problems and too much usdc slows decentralization. I believe the plan is to slowly increase the AMO for the sfrxeth/frax AMO. It was recently proposed to be raised to 30 million and I think the proposals for that are going to be more aggressive moving forward. I personally am not for lusd swapping and believe the increase of the AMO is the better way forward. Moving too fast towards eth backing has its own issues.
Обсуждают сегодня