209 похожих чатов

Only reason it got me feeling uneasy - even though

ledger says it's "encrypted", what's to stop a government from sending a court order to the 3 companies that hold the fragments and giving up access to the requesting authority?

They piece all the fragments together, then have access to your wallet. Even with that scenario out of mind, it still goes against their original idea of why the Ledgers were built in the first place. Nothing, absolutely nothing was ever suppose to leave the device, encrypted or not.

Pretty much why using an opensource alternative is perfectly ideal.

edit: on top of that, with anyone actually using it, they (ledger) archive your personal identifiable data for 7 years for "litigation purposes", according to their privacy policy. A lot of red flags to me.

5 ответов

16 просмотров

Same thing can happen at trezor

Only have access to your wallet if they have your pin

Then maybe dont use it?

Why bother with the other three companies? The first step is, Ledger has the entire seed before it's encrypted and split.

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта