as the contrary isn’t shown. Then why wouldn’t the same group of people making treasury decisions?
@tascha_panpan didn’t tag you maybe you didn’t see but insight is needed here.
Because any change related to the token requires token holders to vote for projects that already have tokens gone live
Well the treasury holds more than 50%, so in fact yes but you can still make up the vote with the treasury itself, so be it. Where I’m going to is the way that after the seizure of the assets you said that you got no money to pay the debt. I beg to differ. 0xJordan confirmed that 250-300m of tokens are sitting in the treasury and can be used to pay the debt. Whether it will happen or not that not the only point. Point here is that you communicated in a way that you got no money but you actually do. Plus like many stated previously and le included, we have no access to your finances so the treasury is only the tip of your owning. What is the repayment plan? Remember i proposed the segregated account to accumulate wealth there? As of today there is no plan to pay the debt that you stated is still due as the collateral has not been consumed by IB and as you have not paid yet. My simple question is: how does AVD plans to repay It’s debt? Even the agreement of 20% of the protocol fees (as per the agreement here: https://etherscan.io/address/0x141e0541d87c6cbdbf2a6a8104248b4b922f629e?ref=blog.alphaventuredao.io#code ) is no longer in place. Again how are you planing to pay what you owe whether it is to IB or to users depending on how the situation unfolds. You can’t wipe a debt (because as of today, it is what it seems like: you have no plan to repay and have rebranded. I know users voted on a goodwill fund but that unrelated because your debt stands and you have to pay).
Обсуждают сегодня