probably was their best bet to have a working product)decided to cut ties(low usage most likely/making room for their credit card). The “transformers” have zero utility at the moment and honestly there is probably nobody here who could even explain how it functions in the current system(does it even work through SPEDN?). Not to mention SPEDN itself having a lack-luster interface(even as a test-product). Flexa has failed to deliver SDK that was “promised” in summer 2021…. Since then all it has done is add useless ERC-20 tokens to spend(which doesn’t take much work) and some other native tokens.
Lightspark is a nice “partnership” but again until we see actual delivery, I am skeptical of Flexa. And at this point the lack of communication from Flexa and Ampera is palpable by most people in this token.
Flexa's major misstep lies in setting specific expectations and timelines for investors. The ever-changing nature of technology, coupled with unforeseen events like the collapses of FTX and Luna, presents numerous variables that underline Flexa's need to adapt within its evolving tech environment. It would be kind of shortsighted to disregard these factors and conclude that Flexa has outright failed. In reality, they persist by forging partnerships and actively constructing their endeavors. Even the release of the L4L video, months after the SEC's allegations regarding AMP's security status, serves as an indication of their continued progress.
Обсуждают сегодня