we be placed in this awkward position? And being accused of having fake followers and so on? Having that account was NOT A PLAN OF ERGONAUTS! Why should we keep something that id impacting us in a nehative way and was not a plan nor decision of Ergo. Time to gove it back to get over it and charles can make a meme page for funny dog videos or gove it back to ETC or whatever. It would not be ours problem anymore
Simply, it was given to the ergo foundation. While the EF has community members it is not the community organization. That’s the sigmanauts. The EF made a call and some people are ok with it and some people aren’t. But it’s their account and they can solicit direction from the community as they have, or not. If you want to change things in the ecosystem, you can engage in the community side (Sigmanauts) and support and push forward their mission. I’ll also say it because no one else will, and I can since I’m not the EF and just a community member. When ergo price increases to be very profitable to mine, most miners will ignore the ETC Twitter drama. Currently claiming they don’t mine ergo because of the Twitter event is EXTREMELY disingenuous and very low hanging fruit of a reason.
Yeah, but drawing such a big line between the Ergo foundation and sigmanauts community seems to be against the principles of Ergo? Like if we want to show how community driven and open Ergo is..
Обсуждают сегодня