that 1% of purchases/volume goes to staking rewards and will consider 50% of $uos is being staked which would be around 450mil $uos staked.
Steam revenue:
- year 2019 - 4.5billion $
- year 2020 - 9.7billion $
- year 2021 - 10billion $
lets hope we can make it to 10% of steam revenue, so that means that staking 10k $uos would reward you with:
- 2019 -> $8.3 monthly
- 2020 -> $18 monthly
- 2021 -> $18.5 monthly
now with NFT trading volume with data from https://www.cryptoslam.io/nftglobal?headerPeriod=all&timeFrame=month
Total NFT volume per month (based on Sales, so might include some wash trading):
- 2021 january - 0.1 billion $
- 2022 january - 6 billion $
- 2023 january - 1 billion $
Also $uos for staking will be bought at the start of month to calculate APY
So lets say Ultra can grab 10% of total volume, then staking 10k $uos will reward you with:
- in 2021 jan - $2.35 monthly - cost to buy 10k $UOS ($1280) which leads to 2% APY
- in 2022 jan (top of bull market) - $130 monthly, but it costs significantly more to buy 10k $uos ($15700), so 0.82% APY
- in 2023 jan - $20 monthly - cost to buy 10k $uos ($1800), so 13% APY
Thoughts? Can you find any math errors?
Thanks for doing an estimate. If we look at this example, removing 50% of circulating supply and an apy of 0.82% - 13% apy with none of those rewards coming from inflation seems like a positive to me
Interesting, not sure ultra is motivated by providing token value, that's why we've just meandered since ICO
Here is his theoretical calculation
Well, first we would need that massive volume first.. 100 million of trading volume a month is far far away. Until then, all the stakers would get peanuts
things go crazy really quick ;)
there is not even 50 % in circ BTW.
Who said Ultra wouldnt stake themselves?
Обсуждают сегодня