concerns regarding tokenomics? The new comers seem to constantly bring it up as well.
Yes of course. Its a sensitive topic, one that needs to be analyzed meticulously. - First the coingecko information needed correction , that has been solved already. - Now we are evaluating further ideas to strengthen our tokenomics, in a way that is sustainable and brings trust to the community.
since when it is solved? currently there is 352m in circulation according to coingecko but we all know its more like 850m when the ceo mentioned it the last time
Hope we will have news soon about it Patrick !
Hi, could you explain why its a sensitive topic to help us better understand the predicament
Honestly, considering how horrible they are for the investors, it shouldn’t be sensitive or controversial to come up with some changes
If it was horrible then why did you invest?
Probably but I am not rocket scientist because he had different expectations. Your question should be why are you still here😗
Joe's dad sponsored me
Hey Patrick, Mr Stache in this vidéo of ranking gaming project where we are on top , say that the supply of Ultra was "weird".. So hope to see your plan to correct that as you mention before with transparency ans sustainability
it is not up to me to correct peoples perception of things. That video is not sponsored by us. Nonetheless ill talk with him to see what he considered wierd about it , and try to resolve any doubts he might have
Did you say the team working on the tokeneconomics for more transparency and sustainability ?
by the way , he mentioned that it was weird that there was not more info on the max supply .. but just because CMC doenst show it. Coingecko does. Anyway , overall he talked great stuff about UOS and Ultra , glad he places us in the top places :)
yep , looking into it. But nothing decided yet.
Обсуждают сегодня