global liquidity
2- governance and community development (Flow might be the only L1 blockchain which has not passed a single governance proposal this year)
3- network and protocol development. Flow is still communicating on its website on a TPS of 100 transaction per second. If this is true, this is concerning if you want to onboard billion people
4- ecosystem development. Where are the massive developers who are building on Flow? One of the most interesting blockchain use case ‘Web3 games’ seems almost non existent on Flow. We can name the game developers on Flow by a single digit (joyride, heroes of the flow, and maybe an additional 2 or 3). This is nothing compared to the game developers ecosystem on Immutable, Solana, Avalanche, or Polygon.
Correct but the chain you mentioned immutable,solana, avalanche or polygon are discoverers not inventors. They did a good job developing and refining existing things which are know and proven and had precedences But flow team had been inventors of new things weather it is ERC standard for NFT, cryptokitties or NBA topshot. These things didn't have precedences and were popularised by them at start of each bull runs.itbis another fact that others were more nimble and improvised better Inventions take time and are rare when compared to discoveries . One new concept from the team will wipe out all negativity and can take things 100x from here by being trendsetters
Love everything you said plus they’re already addressing those points in the other post
Being inventors doesn’t mean much if you’re not able to grow your ecosystem. Flow team had already couple of chances they burned : 1. Cryptokitties and the erc-721: cryptokitties is in the dust now, and they not have been any follow through, nor ecosystem growth. 2. Nba TS: same Being the first doesn’t mean success in the long term, if you don’t execute properly.
Обсуждают сегодня