FXS, vs just committing to growing the FPI and FPIS effort?
When FPIS was first created there were objections raised at the time, and it was argued that FPIS is not actually a gov token of the frax ecosystem. Seemingly people accepted that or committed to it for a bit.
I know the 100% CR is a catalyst for pushing for this change, but it hasn't been clearly explained (that I've seen anyway) why we *need* to do this.
The argument to merge the two is that you unify all governance and benefits to FXS and everyone knows that all new products will have value go to FXS instead of a new token And so far with each new product that's happened Devs could've launched each new product with a new token and chose not to
Обсуждают сегодня