has fallen in 10 days by -31.89% from high to low since December 27th.
(And that shouldn't be a cause for concern?)
The only positive technical event in the last few days is that the money inflow has risen sharply in the last 24 hours and LUSD has almost pegged 1$ again in last 2 days.
The repeg of lusd happened most probably because of the announcement to reactivate the liquidation mechanism. So this is definitely a positive result of the final steps to get the protocol back up running to 100%. The other thing which makes me positive about linear's near future is the significant reduction of staking rewards, which started in April of last year and is ongoing. So there will be much less Lina to sell after april and we all know what's happening in April this year, right? 😏
Do we even know the 'half' of it?
Positive talk, now i feel comfortable
Time will tell. 🤷♂
Yes this are the reasons for pegged LUSD. Absolutely correct and healthy for the protocol. I can only half agree with you on the other part... There are simply 4 billion tokens left. I once did the math and at the current rate it would take at least until 2029 for all of them to be unlocked (feel free to correct me if I'm wrong). I don't think that's good for the project. That's why I've often recommended burning a percentage of them.
I think the math should be approximately correct. Slow distribution means low inflation. I've discussed some kind of burning mechanism to protect the lusd pegging in the DAO forum. So I'm not totally against burning supply if it serves a purpose beside pumping the bag of everyone. Otherwise it's a bad sign for the projects health imo.
Well said. Burning tokens is often the go to fix for people looking to fake pump a coin, and tbh it rarely works
Ok, you will be able to judge it better, then the issue is off the table from my point of view.
What's is April?
Обсуждают сегодня