It had a 100% positive outcome before your vote, has a fair and very complex calculation from @Lyule67, it was proposed only after the CR100% had been reached and those funds are going to unlock in 6 months anyway.
Why not wait till we actually transition into post cr100 mode? Who would take 7.5 hit on 6 month lock? Would be mental Sam and the team were also against it as they too want to fully transition into post cr100 mode first
Ok, that's fair, but then I would just repurpose the snapshot vote right after the cr100 mode has been fixed @naderghazvini; as for who would take a 7.5 hit on a 6 months hold, the answer is everyone that voted positively (so everyone) did a risk/reward calculation and, given market conditions, decided to go for it.
Yeah people voting for it are not the same as people using it so that bit doesn't make sense But point is from my conversations it still sounded like it was a bit premature
Where was that voiced? I've not seen that said anywhere but by you at this moment. If that had been voiced somewhere in the 12 days before it went to snapshot maybe I would have asked for a delay. Last time we spoke Sam stated he would like to wait for a more healthy macro perspective and higher CR. That time, imo, is now. I voiced my opinion for proposing it pre100 instead of post100 and noone said a word. So. Can you direct me to some dialogue where "everyone on the team opposed it" please? Or is that closed door talk im not privy to? Because as far as I'm aware, those statements were never made anywhere I can see
Обсуждают сегодня