209 похожих чатов

I have a few questions about AMP and Flexa: Could

we see liquidity pools dedicated to apps/wallets? Or only cryptos? (If Lightning pool exists, it’s probably the case)

I need your opinion on this one:
It seems that wallets/integrated apps are under no obligation to buy and stack AMPs, but what assurances do we have that stacked liquidity will increase with utility, and who will increase it if not... ppl like us? And don't we risk a liquidity crisis if utility increases faster than liquidity? Because if I understand correctly, the price of AMP depends very much on stacked liquidity.

7 ответов

28 просмотров

It's laid out really well in the white paper, but it all comes down to economic incentives. Fees collected from purchases are used to buy AMP on the open market to reward stakes, increasing the price of the token. As the price increases, people are incentivized to unstake and sell. Assuming constant usage, this would raise the APY for the pool and others will stake until you hit a new equilibrium.

Also, wallets or merchants are under no obligation to stake amp, but they have an incentive to do so, because their staked amp earning apy would help offset the fees, which the end result could make for even lower costs for payments

Tim
It's laid out really well in the white paper, but ...

I liked the idea of merchants staking AMP themselves so they actually benefit from payments instead of it costing them fees 🤯

Stuart Turner
Lol, beat me to it

Yeah, that was the basis for one of Tyler's talks regarding fee-free payments for merchants I think

Rimmytingler
Yeah, that was the basis for one of Tyler's talks ...

fee free? thats a red flag. no profit not reward.. urgh

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта