Is 3 fpis -> 1 fxs -> 4 vefxs ->

Question

Is 3 fpis -> 1 fxs -> 4 vefxs ->

1 fxs

actually better than

1fpis -> 1.33 vefxs -> 1 fxs

The latter (from the Singularity proposal) means that fpis converters will get less revenue from fees over a 4 year period than from what @WethWood just proposed.

Since the end state is both 1 fxs after 4 years, the question seems to be:

Is the expected yield from having 2.66 more vefxs over a 4 year period (with linear decay) going to be more than 2 fpis at today's prices? I suspect it would be more.

#cryptocurrency #english #frax

0

22.03.2024

5 ответов

12 просмотров

Westwood

The latter is better because you get more FXS long term for even more revenues

0

1 месяц назад

Nik

C2tP
The latter wasn't specific in the proposal and was...

if we vote for 3 FPIS : 1 FXS with 4 year lock, does it still mean 3 cvxFPIS for 1 cvxFXS?

0

1 месяц назад

C2tP

Nik
if we vote for 3 FPIS : 1 FXS with 4 year lock, do...

Yes

0

1 месяц назад

Jefe ElJefe

You mean 1 FPIS -> 1.3 VeFXS -> 1/3 FXS in Westwood proposal Versus 1 FPIS -> 1.3 VeFXs -> 1 FXS In original proposal Westwood proposal actually keeps the voting power effect of the original proposal in effect because he’s dividing the amount received by 3 from the beginning

0

1 месяц назад

C2tP · Accepted Answer

C2tP

The latter wasn't specific in the proposal and was open for discussion. The 3 to 1 but forced lock is probably what will be the option will be

0

1 месяц назад

209 похожих чатов

Is 3 fpis -> 1 fxs -> 4 vefxs ->

5 ответов

Похожие вопросы