five years? At least theoretically?
Well this is completely unhinged hopium but yes certainly
i think it depends upon the scope of the decisions being voted upon. if there are votes which affect the bottom line of large holders, i can imagine them being incentivized to buy and hold anvil to try to sway voting in their favour. but considering the current large holders of amp will automatically receive large amounts of anvil / voting power from the outset, i don't really see this happening for a long while, if at all.
Обсуждают сегодня