(no problem if you can’t)?
I am not using because no one knows about it.
That’s a weak excuse. I take my payments 100% in crypto and most of my crypto expenses are made with nano. It’s already totally possible to actively use nano for different activities (trivial or not). You are not forced to use it, let’s make that clear, but you make a clear example on why nano is not more adopted… If you, who apparently believe in the attributes that makes nano good money, don’t use it… Why would you expect others to start using it? That’s my point. You have this “solution” of forking nano to solve the adoption issue, but unless people really start using it, it’s not a fork that will solve this issue. Want more adoption? Adopt yourself. IT IS POSSIBLE. As I said. The value of nano lies exclusively in its use. No use = no value. And no fork will change that.
But this is basically what I said previously.
That’s not. You want to fork the code somehow thinking this would change the fact that people like you still don’t use nano despite being possible to do so. I want to (and already do) use what we already have.
That't not the only thing I said.
Обсуждают сегодня