209 похожих чатов

Could a company not also choose to take 100% of

the risk, and therefore 100% of the rewards by creating a private pool and being the sole collateral provider?

5 ответов

3 просмотра

I feel like that would defeat the purpose alltogehter

amp is the way
I feel like that would defeat the purpose alltogeh...

I thought that too, they will get low fee and no risk , that’s prob best scenario for them

Neemur-Holtrey Автор вопроса
amp is the way
I feel like that would defeat the purpose alltogeh...

I remember hearing Tyler speak about private and semi-private pools but maybe I'm not remembering the details correctly. It was in the context of giving merchants complete control of the payment fees, which could allow for <= 0% fees for merchants.

Neemur Holtrey
I remember hearing Tyler speak about private and s...

You are right , it was an example of how you could have 0 fees essentially , but then you are also backing the risk. Legend 4 legends 2023 maybe?

Neemur Holtrey
I remember hearing Tyler speak about private and s...

It’s centralized risk vs decentralized risk. Centralized risk in this scenario would cost a lot of money up front which feels like a big hurdle for a lot of companies

Похожие вопросы

Карта сайта