to collude and skew the PoS network ? What would be the effect ?
you need 51% of the supply
it would be really dumb to do as it would be financially bad for them imo
Which is 250~300m US$ at the current market cap. In other words, pretty easy for credible threat actors to collude and take over the network.
its extremely difficult both with POS and POW
Controlling supply has no effect on the network governance for PoW. PoW requires you to buy hardware and electricity to get 51% of the hash rate. It is much more expensive and difficult to achieve without being noticed. PoS you just need to own 51% of the supply then you can vote any change and enforce any rule set through vote. With shielded address, you can do that with nobody noticing that a single actor controls the supply.
i know for pow and i know for pos :D in both cases is difficult
That's not how bid/ask markets work. It shouldn't need to be said that you can't but 300mdd worth without moving the price.
Обсуждают сегодня