lithos dominating mining, lot of mining nodes spread arround the world wich is great for true decentralization) be causing lot of orphan subblocks and then causing some problems?
[cannon_q] IMO you're overestimating mining at a solo scale. Those on pools are generally set-forget and lithos may create smaller pools per se, but you'll have to be a more engaged part of the community to use it (my hunch). IF input blocks are found quicker, that would somewhat mitigate orphans, no?
but lithos isnt like solo mining in terms of node mining? i mean each lithos miner could decide how configure their node and they mine to its own but share rewards with fellows
again, my undereducated thoughts. I haven't seen enough and studied what's out there on lithos to know but sounds like a collateralized pool and several can input shares (doesn't necessarily have to be solo) iirc
Number of sub blocks per block on average is the same regardless mining hashrate or number of miners in the network if I understand your concern correctly
[tulo_ergominnow] Any ETA on sub blocks going live?
i was meaning the propagation collision of sub-blocks on the network of nodes as its target diff is automatically calculated to target it being found/hit each 1 sec, once its found the mining node broadcast it to his peers and so on, how it is 1 sec average i believe it will be a significant amount of multiple found at same time on the network, currently where there are few pools/nodes wich are producing blocks it gets mitigated i believe but if there are thousands of mining nodes spread arround the world it is another story i believe, but maybe its possible im missunderstanding how sub-blocks works or the network. Aside of that im amazed everytime i think about thousand of mining nodes arround the world it reminds me ergo network being like a coomputers-code brain neuronal system and the mining process ruled/running by the statistics / chance like the universe/quantum physics
Обсуждают сегодня