makers" and "MEV sandwich attack resistance." It’s easy to see how you’re targeting pain points in DeFi, but here’s a thought: isn’t all this complexity and automation just a risk factory waiting to implode when the next exploit surfaces? Or are you hoping Carbon DeFi’s fancy new tools make up for that?
By the way, I’m with AbsolutaDigital, and we’re digging into what’s under the hood of projects like yours. I’d love to hear what only the founder would know about what you see as the single most overlooked vulnerability in the Bancor ecosystem. Care to share? 😉
Oh, I’m not familiar with AbsolutaDigital, but I’ll look into it for sure. And thanks for stopping by 😊 If you’re strictly interested in what Mark, Bancor’s Project Lead, has to say unfortunately I can’t do much for you other than forward your message. ATM he’s presenting his research and mathematics on sandwich attacks and arbitrage at MEV Shanghai, so I wouldn’t expect to hear from him within the next few days at least. In the meantime, I can direct you to the whitepaper with the latest Bancor inventions powering Carbon DeFi. After reading through and seeing what’s actually under the hood, you’ll see how immunity to MEV sandwich attacks is a result of the dual bonding curves. As for the automation, there are zero third party dependencies, keepers included. If that’s the risk you’re referring to, it doesn’t apply here.
Absolutely, thanks for the detailed response, Jen. Hey, Mark! I've dug into the whitepaper, and it's clear Carbon's making some interesting moves with asymmetric, parametric liquidity—solid work! But considering how these dual curves drive market-making strategies, I can't help but wonder: what do you see as the biggest under-the-radar risk with this setup? Specifically, when combining such asymmetric liquidity with advanced arbitrage routing, is there a point where the design could potentially expose systemic vulnerabilities in cases of market volatility? Also, I'm with AbsolutaDigital, and we're keen to explore these concepts further. Any chance you'd be open to an in-depth chat or an interview to get into the fine details?
Absolutely, thanks for the detailed response, Jen. Hey, Mark! I've dug into the whitepaper, and it's clear Carbon's making some interesting moves with asymmetric, parametric liquidity—solid work! But considering how these dual curves drive market-making strategies, I can't help but wonder: what do you see as the biggest under-the-radar risk with this setup? Specifically, when combining such asymmetric liquidity with advanced arbitrage routing, is there a point where the design could potentially expose systemic vulnerabilities in cases of market volatility? Also, I'm with AbsolutaDigital, and we're keen to explore these concepts further. Any chance you'd be open to an in-depth chat or an interview to get into the fine details?
Sure. I am in Shanghai until at least the 17th. Maybe we can schedule something for the last week of October?
Sounds perfect, Mark! October 17 works well for me, and I’ve sent a reminder in your DMs. If possible, could you share a link to your calendar there? Thanks again!
Обсуждают сегодня