to using Amp for the next few years to ensure there is no flight risk? It would settle the nerves of investors . Having two tier investors does not help. More control is going to Anvil and obviously with this any large amount of only holders will feel uneasy about the fact that Flexa could diversify their collateral dependency via the Anvil pool
Because they have always said , amp stays as collateral for Flexa. You probably think what your saying is new but this switch of collateral has been discussed for a very long time and the answer is always the same, that’s why long term holders are not asking, we know the answer already
Обсуждают сегодня