210 похожих чатов

I watched the CCV Summit discussion posted yesterday and I

found it quite interesting.

It was clear from the discussions the importance of Identity and UX being key barriers in Blockchain adoption.

It also highlighted some of the challenges to the value proposition of blockchains; in particular, privacy related issues.

I'm wondering what the community thought about the discussions and where people see the true value proposition of blockchains being?

And what roles does Lukso play in it? Considering that everything onchain, linked to your identity (even if its an avatar), is publically visible for all to see - what do you believe are the limitations to Lukso for such a public record?

6 ответов

16 просмотров

Do you consider your social accounts on facebook and twitter private? If not, why would social profiles on Lukso need to be private. I think People want to be seen on social media, and that's the target market.

Metaversal Rich
Do you consider your social accounts on facebook a...

Just a , hidefromprofile option is fine! Like Upage ☺️

Shah- Автор вопроса
Metaversal Rich
Do you consider your social accounts on facebook a...

But it’s not just about social accounts right?! My social account isn’t connected with my ‘airline miles’; my ‘credit card points’; and any other information (let says my watch collection or luxury goods collection). With Lukso, we are saying - brands, corporates etc can build closer relationships with their customers through the ‘social’ chain. In my example; airlines can issue miles to individuals that can trade them on dexes. But I don’t want the general public to know about my miles accumulation for various reasons. —> I say this, without understanding any solutions to with ZK tech solving this. And if there is a solution, well and good. I’m expressing ideas based on what I understood from the CCV Summit talk. Similarly; if I had a watch collection and watch makers were issuing Proof of Ownership NFTs to me via my blockchain address; I wouldn’t want this info to be publically available for every thief to see. Currently, we’re able to see all the top holders of any coin on all chains - but usually, they are long strings that help maintain the privacy of those holders (only freaks like ZachXBT figures out who those owners are). In that case, the long public keys help maintain some level of privacy that a social address doesn’t. And I’m not saying anything bad about Lukso: I have been very interested in this project and pretty much all in on it. I’m very interested in the long term adoption of crypto, and I’m trying to understand the use cases and their limitations.

Shah
But it’s not just about social accounts right?! M...

You can always make a „fake” account that no one can connect you with

Shah
But it’s not just about social accounts right?! M...

Privacy is certainly an issue as blockchains are public by nature. There will be solutions. However er, it appears like most people are willing to sacrifice thier privacy in exchange for the benefits received from using services like Google, Facebook, and X. What I would be more concerned about is complying with privacy laws that might make it difficult for corporations to utilize blockchain.

Metaversal Rich
Privacy is certainly an issue as blockchains are p...

no one cares about privacy , its a crypto bro thing

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

Карта сайта