209 похожих чатов

I guess my question is, does Double VPN actually provide

more meaningful security than just one network wide VPN? If your router is compromised, VPN or not, the devices downstream will likely be compromised as well. Wouldn't it make more sense to use something like pfSense router/firewall at the perimeter of the network with an OpenVPN Concentrator right behind it, which would mask all devices further downstreM

11 ответов

33 просмотра

I have no idea about the concentrator stuff but mobile based Double VPN works on the move as well.

RyGuy | HEX.Toys | Lord of GIFs- Автор вопроса
D (DM = instant block)
I have no idea about the concentrator stuff but mo...

Even mobile, I would think one VPN connection would be sufficient. All a VPN does is allow you to connect to an internal network externally. It just so happens that commercial VPNs are hosted all across the world, so you can virtually connect to any internal commercial VPN network in the world. Doing this twice wouldn't really boost security, I wouldn't think

RyGuy | HEX.Toys | Lord of GIFs- Автор вопроса
D (DM = instant block)
Are you including the encryption in your hypothesi...

Two VPN connections at 256 bit each would just be two separate 256 bit connections. I don't think you can add them for 512. Wouldn't you need a stronger encryption cipher, for example Elliptical Curve Cryptography with 384 bit key length is some of the strongest encryption

RyGuy | HEX.Toys | Lord of GIFs
Two VPN connections at 256 bit each would just be ...

Yes the 384 is way stronger, but don't you have to get past both 256 to get the data.

Have you heard about Deeper Network? They have a product that’s about DPN decentralised private network you should check it out

RyGuy | HEX.Toys | Lord of GIFs- Автор вопроса
Totalfx
Have you heard about Deeper Network? They have a p...

Thanks for the heads up, I have not I'll have to look into that

RyGuy | HEX.Toys | Lord of GIFs
Two VPN connections at 256 bit each would just be ...

It would just make it harder for them - they may access one and then not be able to access the other.

RyGuy | HEX.Toys | Lord of GIFs- Автор вопроса

Похожие вопросы

Обсуждают сегодня

@Benzenoid can you tell me the easiest, and safest way to bu.y HEX now?
Živa Žena
20
This is a question from my wife who make a fortune with memes 😂😂 About the Migration and Tokens: 1. How will the old tokens be migrated to the new $LGCYX network? What is th...
🍿 °anton°
2
What is the Dex situation? Agora team started with the Pnetwork for their dex which helped them both with integration. It’s completed but as you can see from the Pnetwork ann...
Ben
1
Anyone knows where there are some instructions or discort about failed bridge transactions ?
Jochem
21
@lozuk how do I get my phex copies of my ehex from a atomic wallet, to move to my rabby?
Justfrontin 👀
11
Hello, Is iExec also part of the "inception program" or another one ? Would it be a name to qualified the nature of the relationship between iExec and Nvidia? And does Secret ...
Ñïķøłäś
8
Ready for some fun AND a chance to win TKO Tokens? Join us for exciting minigames in our Telegram group! 🕒 Don’t miss out—games start on today 25 October 2024, at 8 PM! Ge...
Milkyway | Tokocrypto
255
any reference of this implementation?
BitBuddha
29
Also, why can’t the community have a vote/ say when it comes to initiatives like buybacks. Isn’t the point of crypto decentralisation? Don’t we deserve input as long term supp...
👨🏽‍🦰
13
Hi guys, any problem with Pulsebrige? Trying to transfer from wETH to ETH. First it tells me to connect my metamask "through mobile app" not desktop. Then I did and confirmed ...
Snowflakecrypto
13
Карта сайта