planned for an official reply to the technical critics outlined in the paper (re vulnerabilities and tokenomics)? I think that would be great for the community to move forward with confidence in the product. The fact that one of the lead developers the past years has been taking aim at the technical foundations is something of concern.
Its in the paper, about the tokenomics, the centralization and difficulties for onboarding, and the vulnerabilities linked to token used as governance and gas. Also, the fact that there is no blockchain as base layer in the provide proposal questions the necessity of baseledger. I don't have questions for provide (I mean I would but that's not for UB). I'd like to know how UB addresses these critics about the model envisaged.
How could provide network be decentralised if it wasn’t a blockchain?
Обсуждают сегодня