the engineer therefore fund can be compromised no?
-Requires old device where the issue hasn't been resolved -Physical access -knowledge of the engineer who found the exploit. I would say that's a relatively small attack surface
I agree but why does decrypt write that the chip is still vulnerable? Or the trezor guys have changed the chip?
I assume the vulnerability is in the design/components of the old version device and trezor have already identified the issue on newer ones
Обсуждают сегодня